D Compiler for .NET

Source code checked in, #70298

Project Collection Service Accounts — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:36:45 GMT

Upgrade: New Version of LabDefaultTemplate.xaml. To upgrade your build definitions, please visit the following link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=254563

Source code checked in, #70297

Project Collection Service Accounts — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:31:58 GMT

Checked in by server upgrade

New Post: Is D.NET Dead?

cristiv — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:24:43 GMT

I think hash tables may need a little bit more work.

Also, the project needs constant updating to follow the front-end changes. I found this to be very time consuming and frustrating.

Another tricky part was to make "import" work seamlessly with D modules and .NET stuff. D's notion of modules does not map perfectly onto the .NET namespace model.

New Post: P/Invoke

movax — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:42:29 GMT

You should be able to call C++ from D.NET afaik. As of calling native D methods compiled using DMD, things can be harder (especially considering name mangling and memory management), but please try.

New Post: Is D.NET Dead?

movax — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:40:29 GMT

cristiv, could you at least say what would need most work? Project isn't in bad shape, but probably some things need updates.

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:37:13 GMT

Hi, i started hacking with dnet, and it looks to be working pretty nice, but some tests failes:

y:~/Projekty/D/dnet/dnet-48188/trunk/dmd$ make 2>&1 | grep -E -i 'Test Failed|^OK'
OK: void_main
OK: main
OK: assert
OK: Comparisons
OK: opEquals
OK: opEquals 2
OK: Logical And
OK: Logical And, ShortCirc.
OK: Logical And If
OK: Logical Or
OK: Bitwise And
OK: Bitwise Or
OK: Bitwise Xor
OK: postinc
*** Test Failed: postinc_2 (postinc_2.exe)
OK: post decrement
OK: pre increment
OK: pre decrement
*** Test Failed: for loop (for.exe)
*** Test Failed: for / continue (forcont.exe)
*** Test Failed: for w/ labeled break (for_lbreak.exe)
*** Test Failed: for w/ labeled continue (for_lcont.exe)
OK: forever
OK: while
OK: while var
OK: while, break
OK: while, cont
OK: do while, cont
OK: if, else
OK: if not, else
OK: vargs_0
OK: fields
OK: nested fields
OK: static var
OK: static field
OK: static ctor
OK: Exception Handling 1
OK: Exception Handling 2
OK: Exception Handling 3
OK: Exception Handling 4
OK: Exception Handling 5
OK: Exception Handling 6
*** Test Failed: Exception Handling 7 (eh_7.exe)
*** Test Failed: Exception Handling 8 (eh_8.exe)
OK: eh_9
OK: Static Array 1
OK: Static Array 2
OK: Static Array 3
*** Test Failed: Static Array of Struct (sas.exe)
OK: Member Array of Struct
OK: Array 1
OK: Array 2
OK: Array 3
OK: Array 4
OK: Array 5
OK: Array 6
OK: Array 7
OK: Array 8
OK: Array 9
OK: Array 10
OK: Array 11
*** Test Failed: Array Index (aindex.exe)
*** Test Failed: Assoc. Array Index (aaindex.exe)
OK: Array Concatenation
OK: Array Concatenation
OK: Dynamic Array Length 1
*** Test Failed: Dynamic Array Length 2 (dal_2.exe)
OK: Dynamic Array Length 3
OK: explicit delete
OK: explicit delete w/ scope
OK: function scope static var
OK: function scope static var 2
OK: assign struct fields
OK: struct literals
OK: struct static fields
OK: template struct / literals
OK: array struct members
OK: struct init
OK: struct initializers
OK: default param
OK: switch case
OK: switch fallthru
OK: default fallthru
OK: no default
OK: switch with var labels
OK: switch no case
OK: conditional exp
OK: shift left
OK: shift right
OK: shift right unsigned
*** Test Failed: Array Literal Foreach (alit_foreach.exe)
*** Test Failed: Array Foreach (a_foreach.exe)
*** Test Failed: Array Foreach Reverse (a_foreach_reverse.exe)
*** Test Failed: Foreach Range (foreach_range.exe)
*** Test Failed: Array Concat Foreach (ac_foreach.exe)
OK: foreach opApply
OK: foreach delegate
OK: comma
OK: simple assoc array
OK: global assoc array
OK: assoc array length
*** Test Failed: foreach array postblit (feapblit.exe)
OK: global assoc array literal
OK: global assoc array literal 2
OK: assoc array literal arg
OK: assoc array literal foreach
OK: method override
OK: super
OK: string.length
OK: string.ptr
OK: string var ptr
OK: string_literal.len
OK: string.dup
OK: string.sort
OK: string.reverse
OK: Nested Functions
OK: Template method call
OK: Struct template method call
OK: Variadic template call
OK: Member nested function
OK: Struct member nested function
OK: Non-member nested function
OK: Ctor delegation
OK: Class invariant
OK: Class invariant assert
OK: interface
OK: delegates
OK: nested delegate
OK: param by ref
*** Test Failed: return by ref (ref_3.exe)
OK: method w/ param by ref
OK: var args by ref
OK: modify ret ref
OK: modify ret ref 2
OK: modify ret ref 3
OK: ret ref / postinc
OK: multi-source
OK: struct fields
*** Test Failed: foreach over tuples (feot.exe)
*** Test Failed: foreach over tuples w/ indices (feot2.exe)
OK: Fibonacci
OK: array member append
*** Test Failed: array member init (ami.exe)
OK: array member append 2
OK: array member append 3
*** Test Failed: in-remove (inremove.exe)
OK: forward module reference
OK: Hidden method call
OK: lazy argument evaluation
OK: template alias
OK: escape sequences
OK: nested class
baryluk@sredniczarny:~/Projekty/D/dnet/dnet-48188/trunk/dmd$

Details in attachment.

$ gmcs --version
Mono C# compiler version 2.4.4.0
$ ilasm2 --version
Mono ILasm compiler version 2.4.4.0
$ gcc --version
gcc (Debian 4.4.4-9) 4.4.5 20100816 (prerelease)

dnet Compiled from Commit 48188
Comments: ** Comment from web user: movax **

THis was reported in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633312
Fixed in commit https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/262e68086c2cf433f07c9edc176c95878df87282
Should be working in Mono 2.10.x

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:31:25 GMT

Bug in ilasm2 /debug input/ouput is fixed. Mono 2.10.6 should work.

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:30:40 GMT

Bug in ilasm2 /debug is already fixed. Should work in Mono 2.10.6.

New Post: Is D.NET Dead?

cristiv — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:45:37 GMT

There's no successor AFAIK. Feel free to take the source and fork it if you want to continue the project, I have no time at this point.

Cheers,

Cristian

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:06 AM, "vmlinuz" <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: vmlinuz

Anyway, can someone kindly point me out to the successor of this project, please? At least Google can't.

New Post: Is D.NET Dead?

vmlinuz — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:06:26 GMT

Anyway, can someone kindly point me out to the successor of this project, please? At least Google can't.

New Post: Is D.NET Dead?

vmlinuz — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:05:18 GMT

Last commit to the trunk was made about 2 years ago.

New Post: P/Invoke

vmlinuz — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:04:24 GMT

Seems noone is interested in this topic yet((

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:46:41 GMT

Mono bug (it was indeed bug in ilasm2) is now fixed. Will retest soon.

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:13:33 GMT

This was a bug in Mono's ilasm2. It was reported as bug 633312in mono bugzilla and is now fixed in git repository. It will be released as 2.10.2 I suppose. After this release I will rerun smoketest.

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:15:58 GMT

I tested also with ilasm version 2.6.3.0, and result is the same.

What is interesting, is that without /debug flag to ilasm2, compilation is sucesfull. Will contact Mono developers.

Commented Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:35:26 GMT

Maybe it is bug in Mono's ilasm2 ? As the exception is not in the generated .exe, but in ilasm2! (which is written in C# it looks)!

Created Issue: smoketest failures [5052]

movax — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:33:30 GMT

Created Issue: Binaries are not executable under Linux [5051]

movax — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:27:06 GMT

It would be nice if generated .exe files will have executable bit set.

currently i need to do this manually.

Source code checked in, #48188

_TFSSERVICE — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:15:13 GMT

Checked in by server upgrade

New Post: P/Invoke

vmlinuz — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:06:31 GMT

Generally, all it's about the known P/Invoke call feature of .NET platform. .NET currently supports many programming languages, not the last of them is C++ - the only language which supports programming both managed code and a native one. I wonder if D.NET has such capability - it actually does have a native compiler, so can I just call native D code from the managed one as easily as I can do it with C++? I think that having another native language in .NET stack is good choice even for those who use C# as their current managed one - they would possibly call unmanaged D code from the C# one if there were such possibility. Yours, Volodymyr